Authority: Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost
History: First Issued: September 4, 2002. Last Revised: March 1, 2005.
NCSU POL05.20.01 – Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion and Permanent Tenure
NCSU RUL05.67.308 – College of Engineering Reappointment, Promotion and Tenure Standards and Procedures
NCSU REG05.20.27 – Statements of Mutual Expectations
Office of the Provost RPT Website
Contact Info: Department Head (919-515-2324)
This rule describes the standards and procedures for reappointment, promotion, and tenure in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and is supplemental to and consistent with the college rule and the university Academic Tenure Policy.
The mission of the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering is to be a national leader in chemical and biomolecular engineering research and to achieve excellence in teaching. Chemical and biomolecular engineering graduates are our product, and those graduates pursue careers in industry, enter the University teaching and research arena, or utilize their intellectual skills in an increasingly diverse set of other contributions to the global society.
- Areas of Faculty Responsibility
The realms of responsibilities include: teaching and mentoring students, discovery of knowledge, technological and managerial innovation, extension and engagement with constituencies outside the university, and service in professional societies and within the university itself. The manner in which various faculty members may demonstrate their contributions in these realms may vary, and the individual’s Statement of Mutual Expectations describes the realms in which the faculty member will focus and on which he/she will be evaluated.
The assessment of a particular faculty member’s individual combination of contributions will be evaluated using the standards described in Sections III-VII.
- General Standards
3.1. Evaluation based on performance of assigned responsibilities as described in the Statement of Mutual Expectations.
Each faculty member must progress from the potential (for promotion to Associate Professor) to the achievement (for promotion to Professor) of national or international recognition based on the faculty member’s contributions in their assigned responsibilities as stated in their Statement of Mutual Expectations. Reappointment, promotion and/or tenure will be evaluated for each faculty member with an appropriate andindividual integration across their assigned responsibilities, including effective service to the institution. Also, at each rank, the department requires evidence of appropriate quality of scholarship and leadership in those realms of responsibility.
3.2. Good teaching required.
Evidence of good teaching must accompany each positive recommendation for reappointment, promotion and tenure.
3.3. Scholarship Research and Scholarly achievements
Scholarship is the total of the faculty member’s activities that contribute to knowledge or application of knowledge. Scholarly activities include publishing papers in peer-reviewed journals, publishing monographs or textbooks, contributing chapters to edited works, presenting contributed and invited presentations at technical meetings and workshops, transferring technology to industry, filing patent applications, and all other activities aimed at generating, contributing to or disseminating knowledge.
Leadership is the ability to inspire, influence, or guide others. Leadership activities include membership and activity in professional societies; service on institutional, regional, national, and international committees and panels; developing new courses; writing proposals and successfully competing for external support; organizing workshops and conferences; and supporting and directing graduate students to successful completion of advanced degrees.
3.5. Focus on quality of contributions
In reviewing a recommendation for reappointment, promotion and tenure, the focus is on quality of contributions. Evidence for quality of scholarship can include awards and honors (e.g., outstanding paper awards), numerous citations of publications by peers, wide adoption of a textbook, invited papers and talks (especially at the national or international level), successful patents, adoption of methods by peers in industry or at other universities, strong demand for high-level consulting services, external support through peer-reviewed proposals, and strong letters of recommendation from persons able to judge significance and quality of contributions. Activity and quantity are also important, but primarily to the extent that they have resulted in a body of work subject to peer review.
Evidence of quality of leadership can include election or appointment to positions of responsibility in professional societies and in technical conferences; service as editor of a respected journal; chairmanship of institutional, regional, national, and international committees, boards, and panels; peer evaluations of impact on engineering education and practice; outstanding teacher awards; substantial external research support; and outstanding service in an administrative position.
- Standards for Reappointment as Assistant Professor
Reappointment at the rank of assistant professor requires that the individual is making satisfactory progress towards meeting the standards for promotion to the rank of associate professor with tenure.
- Standards for Associate Professor with Tenure
Promotion to associate professor may only occur with tenure and will be evaluated for each faculty member with an appropriate and individual integration across the faculty member’s contributions relative to the faculty member’s negotiated Statement of Mutual Expectations. In general, the expectation is that a faculty member will have demonstrated the potential to achieve national or international recognition for the faculty member’s contributions in leadership and research and scholarly achievements.
- Standards for Professor
Promotion to the rank of professor will be evaluated for each faculty member with an appropriate and individual integration across the faculty member’s contributions relative to the faculty member’s negotiated Statement of Mutual Expectations. In general, the expectation is that a faculty member will have achieved national or international recognition for the faculty member’s contributions in leadership and research and scholarly achievements .
- Procedures for RPT Review
The Department shall review its faculty each year to determine which individuals should be considered for reappointment, promotion, or tenure. The Department shall identify those individuals for whom a decision is mandatory and shall determine which other individuals should be officially considered. Individual faculty members may also request that they be reviewed.
Department procedures will be consistent with the college and university procedures. The schedule of deadlines for dossier submission and DVF meetings will be set and communicated by the Department Head.