RUL 05.68.33 – Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Post Tenure Review Standards and Procedures

Authority: Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost

History: First Issued: March 24, 2010. Last Revised: August 1, 2016.

Related Policies:
UNC Policy 400.3.3 – Performance Review of Tenured Faculty
NCSU POL05.20.01 – Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion and Permanent Tenure
NCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty
NCSU REG05.20.27 – Statements of Mutual Expectations
NCSU REG05.20.10 – Evaluation of Teaching

Additional References:
Office of the Provost RPT Website
NC State Guide on Peer Review of Teaching

Contact Info:  Department Head (919-513-2857)

  1. INTRODUCTION        

This rule describes standards and procedures of the Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering for post tenure review of faculty.  It supplements NC State University’s Academic Tenure Policy and Regulation on Post Tenure Review of Faculty.  To the extent of any inconsistency, the Academic Tenure Policy and Post Tenure Review Regulation control.  The Department Head is responsible for assuring that the procedures as set forth inNCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty and this Rule are followed.

  1. Post Tenure Review Committee (PTRC) 

2.1   Selection

2.2 Meeting Schedule

In Fall semester the Department Head will announce which faculty will be reviewed during that year and what the schedule will be.  The review will be held in the spring after the candidate has assembled the required materials, as set forth in Section 5.2 of NCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty, from each faculty member to be reviewed.

  1. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO THE PTRC

The documentation provided to the PTRC is set forth in Section 5.2 of NCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty.

  1. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

4.1 Standards for Associate Professor

Associate Professors are to be evaluated to determine if they are performing the realms of responsibility set forth in their Statement of Mutual Expectations at the Associate Professor standard as set forth in the Department’s Rule on Reappointment, Promotion and Tenure Standards and Procedures.  To meet expectations as a result of the PTR, they must present evidence that they are maintaining the standards for promotion to associate professor as set forth in the Academic Tenure Policy and college and departmental reappointment, promotion and tenure rules. To exceed expectations as a result of the PTR, they must exhibit exemplary quality of scholarship, teaching, and/or service beyond the expectations defined in their Statement of Mutual Expectations.

4.2 Standards for Professor

Professors are to be evaluated to determine if they are performing the realms of responsibility set forth in their Statement of Mutual Expectations at the standard set forth in the Department’s Rule on Reappointment, Promotion and Tenure Standards and Procedures.  To meet expectations as a result of the PTR, they must present evidence that they are maintaining the standards for promotion to full professor as set forth in the Academic Tenure Policy and college and departmental reappointment, promotion and tenure rules. To exceed expectations as a result of the PTR, they must exhibit exemplary quality of scholarship, teaching, and/or service beyond the expectations defined in their Statement of Mutual Expectations.