RUL 05.68.49 – Department of Economics Post Tenure Review Standards and Procedures

Authority: Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost

History: First Issued: December 11, 2009.

Related Policies:
UNC Policy 400.3.3 – Performance Review of Tenured Faculty
NCSU POL05.20.01 – Appointment, Reappointment, Promotion and Permanent Tenure
NCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty

NCSU REG05.20.27 – Statements of Mutual Expectations
NCSU REG05.20.10 – Evaluation of Teaching

Additional References: 
Office of the Provost RPT Website
NC State Guide on Peer Review of Teaching

Contact Info:  Department Head (919-513-2880)


1.  INTRODUCTION

This rule describes standards and procedures of the Department of Economics for post tenure review of faculty.  It supplements NC State University’s Academic Tenure Policy and Regulation on Post Tenure Review of Faculty.  To the extent of any inconsistency, the Academic Tenure Policy and Post Tenure Review Regulation control. The Department Head is responsible for assuring that the procedures as set forth in NCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty and this Rule are followed.

2.  POST TENURE REVIEW COMMITTEE (PTRC)

2.1. Selection

2.1.1 The PTRC shall consist of three tenured faculty members elected by the tenured faculty of the Department of Economics.  PTRC members will serve staggered terms with one new member being elected each year.  All tenured faculty in the department are eligible to serve on the PTRC, unless they will be reviewed during the term.

2.1.2 In any given academic year, the member of the PTRC who is serving for his or her last year will chair the committee.  The PTRC Chair should familiarize himself or herself with the applicable policies and regulations and this rule.

2.1.3 The head shall initiate the election at the beginning of the academic year by soliciting nominations during the first two weeks of the fall term.  Reasonable effort will be made to get at least two nominees for the vacant PTRC position.  Elections should be held in the third week of the semester.  A candidate will be considered elected if a majority of eligible voters has voted and the candidate receives a majority of the votes cast.  If these conditions are not met then a runoff election will be held during the next week.  The two candidates receiving the most votes will be eligible for the runoff.  In case of a vacancy on the PTRC, the Department Head after consultation with the Departmental Voting Faculty shall appoint a replacement to serve until the next PTRC election. At that time a new member will be elected to complete the term for that position.

2.2. Meeting Schedule

The PTRC Chair will meet with the Department Head early in the fall semester to learn who will be reviewed during that year and what the schedule will be.  The main review will be held in the spring after the Department has assembled the required materials, as set forth in section 5.2 of university NCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty, from each faculty member to be reviewed.

The PTRC Chair will schedule all meetings, coordinate with the Department Head, and prepare and transmit reports from the committee to the Head and to the faculty members reviewed.

3.  DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO THE PTRC

The documentation provided to the PTRC is set forth in section 5.2 of university NCSU REG05.20.04 – Post Tenure Review of Faculty.

4. ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES REQUIRED BY DEPARTMENT

N/A

5.  PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

5.1 Standards for Associate Professor

Associate Professors are evaluated to determine if they are performing satisfactorily in the realms of responsibility set forth in their Statement of Mutual Expectations (SME). For most faculty, these realms of responsibility are teaching, research, and service. Satisfactory teaching requires faculty to be effective in the classroom, as indicated by the summative peer reviews, student evaluations, and other evidence on effective teaching.  Satisfactory research requires faculty to have an active research program. Publications, working papers, conference presentations, and research grant proposals are examples of evidence of an active research program.  Satisfactory service requires faculty to participate in department, college, or university committee activities and to participate in professional service in keeping with the needs of the department.

5.2 Standards for Professor

Professors are to be evaluated to determine if they are performing satisfactorily in the realms of responsibility set forth in their Statement of Mutual Expectations (SME). For most faculty, these realms of responsibility are teaching, research, and service. Satisfactory teaching requires faculty to be effective in the classroom, as indicated by the summative peer reviews, student evaluations, and other evidence on effective teaching.  Satisfactory research requires faculty to have an active research program. Publications, working papers, conference presentations, and research grant proposals are examples of evidence of an active research program.  Satisfactory service requires faculty to participate in department, college, or university committee activities and to participate in professional service in keeping with the needs of the department.